Who Is To Blame For Our Actions :: essays research papers

Assumption of Risk Who is to Blame For Our Actions     The doctrine of "assumption of risk" clearly defines the responsibilityof all voluntary actions taken on by individuals, independent of the inherentrisk or danger involved with such actions. Are we only to contain responsibilityfor the positive gists of our actions, without also judge the negativeoutcomes as well? Most individuals only claim responsibility in cases in whichthey are fully responsible for their actions. Living within a country whichhouses a large amount of cloak-and-dagger enterprise, we often find ourselves relying onoutside help. In many occasions we, the individual seeking assistance, give birth thepower to choose which avenue of help will be taken. In these cases in which wehave the choice, should we not also be held responsible for the outcomes of ourdecisions, especially in cases in which we have been pre-warned about anyinherent risks or dangers? For example, When we take it upon ourselves to driveon a private road, smoke butt joints, work for a minelaying company, or fly on adiscount airline at our own volition, do we tacitly consent to takeresponsibility for any outcome these actions may hold? The "assumption of risk"doctrine seems to ignore the fundamental obligation of entities to ensure theirnatural goals. The distinguishing factor in deciding responsibility infaultless cases which call on the "assumption of risk" doctrine is the controlheld by individuals after the situation has begun. In accordance, companiessuch as discount airlines and cigarette companies must take on theresponsibility of complemental their duties, while individuals who chose to workin a mine or drive on a private road must accept the responsibility of theiractions to do so.     All airlines hold the responsibility of transporting their customersfrom a point of origin to a previously designated destination. The person whoagrees to steal a discount airline ticket, which warns to "fly at your own risk,"is entitled to receive the minimum service of transportation provided by theairline. The individual traveler should assume no other benefits other thantransportation. The airline company claims this act of transportation to be itsgoal of services rendered. Independent of difficulties which may arise incompleting this goal, the airline may not alter the basic duty which it iscontractually obligated to perform. The airline tacitly consented to performthis basic duty the moment they began transporting individuals for an realpayment. Once an individual has boarded the airplane they render all controlover their safety to the accepting airline which holds the minimumresponsibility of returning the individual plunk for to a state of safety once their